We’ve been spending the last couple of days remembering Maurice Strong, the “godfather of global warning,” who died on November 27. We’ve seen that Strong was something of a New Age wacko and a champion of world government by himself and other UN elites.
But there’s more. As John Izzard noted at the Australian website Quadrant, Strong “was caught with his hand in the till.” Here’s the story:
Investigations into the UN’s Oil-for-Food-Program found that Strong had endorsed a cheque for $988,885 made out to M. Strong — issued by a Jordanian bank. The man who gave the cheque, South Korean business man Tongsun Park[,] was convicted in 2006 in a US Federal court of conspiring to bribe UN officials. Strong resigned and fled to Canada and thence to China where he has been living ever since.
Why China? Apparently Strong enjoyed a special protected status in that country because of his relative Anne Louise Strong (1885-1970), an American author and journalist who was a prolific propagandist for Communism and a friend of Zhou Enlai and Mao Zedong. (According to Izzard, she actually spent two years in an intimate relationship with Mao.)
Claudia Rosett, a first-rate journalist and longtime UN expert, wrote in 2007 that any effort to clean up the UN after a rash of recent scandals – not just the Oil-for-Food scandal, but also scandals involving procurement fraud” and “peacekeeper rape” – must involve “a look at the long and murky career of Maurice Strong, the man who may have had the most to do with what the U.N. has become today.” In all of the darker chapters of recent UN history, stated Rosett, “Maurice Strong appears as a shadowy and often critically important figure.” Above all, she suggested, Strong’s story “illustrates the way in which the U.N., with its bureaucratic culture of secrecy, its diplomatic immunities, and its global reach, lends itself to manipulation by a small circle of those who best know its back corridors.”
As for Strong’s relocation to China, Rosett noted that the country was “a special place for Strong, a self-declared, life-long socialist.” How special? Well, consider this: although it’s “one of the world’s biggest producers of industrial pollution,” China had been profiting handsomely “from the trading of carbon emissions credits – thanks to heavily politicized U.N.-backed environmental deals.” And who arranged those deals? Who else? Maurice Strong.
Rosett painted a vivid picture of the expertise with which Strong used – and, it appears, continually magnified – his power:
Strong has developed a distinctive pattern over the years of helping to set up taxpayer-funded public bureaucracies, both outside and within the U.N., which he then taps for funding and contacts when he moves on to other projects….Through his maneuvers, Strong has nurtured the U.N.’s natural tendencies to grow like kudzu into a system that now extends far beyond its own organizational chart. In this jungle, it is not only tough to track how the money is spent, but almost impossible to tally how much really rolls in – or flows through — and from where, and for what.
One example: through a UN-created outfit called the University for Peace, Strong poured UN funds into North Korea. Of course, the purported ends were humanitarian; but in reality much of that money likely found its way into the Hermit Kingdom’s munitions programs. Rosett noted that at Tongsun Park’s trial, “it emerged in court testimony that a few years after Strong accepted from Park the check for almost $1 million funded by Baghdad, the two men had set up yet another business arrangement.”
And now he’s gone. But his work is finished; the mischief is done. Thanks in extremely large part to Strong, climate change has become a rallying cry for power-hungry elites everywhere, routinely cited by them as a legitimate reason to curb individual liberties and economic freedoms and to transfer political authority in democratic states from those countries’ citizens to the leaders of the UN and other world organizations (which are dominated, in all too many cases, by unfree and partly free nations). Not only was Strong himself a useful stooge in many respects – a champion of Chinese Communism, a tireless agitator for the UN superstate. He was also, as hundreds of adoring obituaries attest, the cause of useful stoogery in blinkered admirers around the world, who, rather than recognizing him as a singular threat to human freedom, celebrated him as a noble savior of the planet.
10 thoughts on “Maurice Strong, dealmaker for China”
DISGUSTING USE OF UNITED NATIONS LIES TO PROMOTE CHINA AND ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. THEY WANT ANYONE WHO FIGHTS BACK IN CAMPS AND GASSED. ANYONE WHO CALLS THEMSELVE A FRIEND OF THE UN IS AN ENEMY OF FREEDOME. STAND UP NOW! WHEN THE FOREIGN TROOPS OCCUPY SOVERIEGN AMERICAN TERRITORY, GIVE THEM NO MERCY
^ well I think that analysis was a bit extreme, but I understand the sentiment. I wont say im a climate change “denier” but certainly a “skeptic”. I think the simple fact that the left, environmentalists, and the U.N. all equate anyone who has doubt or skepticism about climate change to a Nazi, or Holocaust-denier, or any murderous regimes, really disturbs me. Every day I am more and more convinced of a concerted effort to promote world-governance by several coordinated forces, rather than just happy coincidences.
hi i have a large surinam marine toad, 9inch vent to snout, with huge gldo.sahnw long does it take for them to hit 11inch vent to snout.what is the growing rate with these toads.
So we should just keep on ignoring any polluters because reigning that in is a violation of YOUR freedom?
Is that supposed to justify corruption and lies? Sorry but using an unproven problem to repress rights is wrong in anyones playbook
Awww, thanks Julieanne, and sadly you are right! It will break my he;#u&r8230abtt I will have to deal, lol! I am hoping they will love their uniforms, and I will be spared the dressing nightmare each morning! They can wear whatever they want when they get to college, rofl!